2008 Permanent Index Hits

Discussion in 'The Comp Buzz' started by Will Hanna, Feb 14, 2008.

  1. Craig Bourgeois

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    15
    "All that bitching about factors, and there were only 1 hit at the Vegas 2 Natls, 3 hits at the Vegas div., but 6 at Pomona at 2500-3800 ft."

    The way I fugure the difference in performance for P/S cars at both Pomona 2 & Vegas 2, the factor is off at least .04. If you take the 6.63 #1 spot for Pomona & add the factor to it, the quickest qualifier @ vegas beat that number by .04. I believe that the factor is definately wrong. I usually run about .3 tenths slower that the best pro stocker. So that means at vegas, I could potentially run 7.00 on a 7.70 index. I think I would pass on that race, which I did.
     
  2. 2006HaasGTO

    2006HaasGTO New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    I ran .02 slower at Denver than PS; .04 quicker at Sonoma; .01 quicker at Vegas; and .03 quicker at Pomona. But my MPH was always faster; Denver 1.38, Sonoma 5.23, Vegas 3.76, Pomona 2.41.

    No idea what all that means, except that I'm about as quick as they are.

    Craig - wanna take a shot at crew chiefing this baby for me?

     
    #62 2006HaasGTO, Nov 25, 2008
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2008
  3. Craig Bourgeois

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    15
    To me, I would be looking at your Denver tune-up. It seems to be off.
     

Share This Page