Taking the Complicated out of our Index Numbers

Discussion in 'The Comp Buzz' started by Andrew Holt, Nov 17, 2023.

  1. Andrew Holt

    Andrew Holt Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    79
    TWO RELATIVELY EASY AND COSMETIC CHANGES I PROPOSE:
    ONE:

    When I try to explain Comp to even other NHRA class racers.. they always glaze over when I try to explain our "go more than .51 under your index... blah blah blah".
    It would make ABSOLUTELY NO CHANGE to the current racing, but I would propose we change the indexes and CIC hits to make it easier for everyone to understand.
    Subtract .5 sec from everyone's index AND make the CIC anything faster than your index.
    My example:

    OLD: Andrew Holt I/D Index 7.17 --> At 6.67 (.50 under) Im clean. At 6.66 (.51 under) I take .01 CIC.
    NEW: Andrew Holt I/D Index 6.67 --> At 6.67 (Even with Index) Im clean. At 6.66 (.01 under) I take .01 CIC.

    PRO: Much easier math. Much easier to explain. Much easier to announce. Much easier for anyone who doesn't race Comp to understand what the hell we are talking about.
    CON: Nhra has to adjust index. Comp racers have come to a consensus to change something cosmetic that has been the same for a long time.
    TWO:
    After the above change, have the scoreboard read the ET ran, and the amount under ran on the scoreboard. From my perspective, MPH is a number that is irrelevant in Comp eliminations.

    With these two changes, anyone could watch a race from the stands, and quickly get explained what is going on... who won a race.. and more importantly why (was someone dead late...).. and what are the ramifications (did he/she blast his index..etc). I think taking the unnecessary complicated part of Comp out of Comp is one small piece of the puzzle to get fans/other racers more interested in it.

    If there is enough people who either think its a good idea, or at the very least don't care one way or the other (It wont change anything about the on track racing... Its a zero sum change)... I would propose this to my D3 rep to have it debated as a change.
     
    #1 Andrew Holt, Nov 17, 2023
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2023
  2. Joey arrowsmith

    Joey arrowsmith Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2017
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    125
    Under this system would there be a time/point where permanent index adjustments would happen?
     
  3. Andrew Holt

    Andrew Holt Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    79
    This isn't remotely a system change. Just how we do our numbers.
    Just trying to make it easier to understand. Every time a friend visits us at a race...their eyes glaze over when I try to explain how our index system works.
    Take 0.5sec off....and you can say:
    Run faster than your index you take temporarily adjustments. Go a tenth faster you take permanent adjustments.
    Simple.
    If the amount under is on the board...they don't need the updated ladder and a calculator to figure out how a race went down.
     
  4. Joey arrowsmith

    Joey arrowsmith Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2017
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    125
    I like it
     
    Andy Moeck and RIchard Brinlee like this.
  5. RIchard Brinlee

    RIchard Brinlee New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2017
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    7
    Me too! Great idea!!!
     
    Andy Moeck likes this.
  6. Andy Moeck

    Andy Moeck New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2022
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    11

    Great idea.
     
  7. Allen Wilson III

    Allen Wilson III New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2017
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    4
    I like it!
     
    Andy Moeck likes this.
  8. Jeff Childs

    Jeff Childs Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    27
    I think another casual fan friendly aspect of this is that it's a half second quicker showing up on the board. I think it's gonna look a lot cooler seeing 6.67 on the board vs a 7.17!
     
    Andy Moeck likes this.
  9. Andrew Holt

    Andrew Holt Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    79
    I agree. Plus... the index makes sense when a fan looks at it... meaning.. a car with a 6.67 index should go around 6.67-ish. If you're used to dial-in type racing.. where the dial-in is exactly how fast it should go.. this makes sense also.

    Really this change is similar to NHRA making the reaction time 0.000 instead of 0.400.

    After thinking about it.. another downside is that you will have cars that are -0.100 under an index.. and +0.100 over an index... so the under/over will be used more. Might take alittle getting used to. I think the PROs outweight the CONs.. IMO.
     
    Andy Moeck and Joey arrowsmith like this.
  10. Alayton11

    Alayton11 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    5
    Don't take the MPH off the scoreboard. I need to see how far you ran from the lanes .:)
     
    oscaracme likes this.

Share This Page